Could love addiction be consistent with well-being on this desire-fulfilment account?


Could love addiction be consistent with well-being on this desire-fulfilment account?

It does seem possible. Specifically, if a charakter desired, freely, to exist in a state of extreme tatkraft-even granting certain negative outcomes-while nevertheless being fully informed about the spirit of addictive love, how elektronische datenverarbeitung might affect her brain (and auf diese weise on), then love addiction and well-being might indeed coincide in such a person. On this view, treatment might bedrangnis be appropriate, even though negative consequences were present.

Finally, there are objective list theories of well-being. According to behauptung theories (sometimes called substantive good or perfectionistic theories), certain things can be good or badeort for a person-and thus contribute to her well being-whether or not they are desired and whether or leid they lead to a wohnhaft “pleasurable” seelisch state. Examples of “objectively” badeort things include: being betrayed, being deceived, and gaining pleasure from cruelty.

On this mensch of theory, it might be harder to square love addiction with any genuine sort of well-being-especially on the “narrow” view. That had been, one could plausibly argue that only “normal” or “healthy” or “constructive” kinds of love are objectively constitutive of well-being, whereas love that ended up being extreme, compulsive, resultant from abnorm brain processes, or that carries negative consequences for one’s health or for other social relationships welches objectively heilquelle for one. If this were the case, then such a wohnhaft love could potentially beryllium deserving of some geflecht of treatment under the right conditions.

Examples of the sorts of things that have been proposed as being intrinsically good hinein this way are: gaining knowledge, having deep personal relationships (including being inside love), engaging as part of vernunftig activity, and developing one’s abilities

Yet what theory of well-being should one accept? Unsurprisingly, philosophers have long noted that each of the theories of well being outlined above capture something important and intuitive about what ended up being needed to live a good life, but weltall have problems as well. Accordingly, many philosophers opt for a wohnhaft composite theory hinein which well-being welches seen as requiring altes testament least certain aspects of kosmos of the theories. On this composite view, then, well-being is constituted by engaging as part of objectively worthwhile activities, which we desire, and which provide amiland with pleasure or other valuable kognitiv states (Savulescu 2007).

To summarize, love will clearly beryllium an important component of any plausible theory of well-being. However, on a composite view, especially one which incorporates aspects of the objective-winkelzug benutzerkonto, love that entails insufferable pain, that frustrates other important desires, or that stops one from engaging as part of objectively worthwhile activities, might reasonably beryllium taken to compromise well-being. The best life is not one that consumed by destructive or zeichen-adaptive forms of love, but is rather one as part of which love finds a wohnhaft zah harmony with other sources of the good.

Implications for treatment

What does kosmos of this mean for treatment upforit beschreibung? With respect to the narrow view of love addiction, informationstechnik means that we will need to make eingeschaltet ethical judgment about how narrow the diagnostic category should beryllium. How strong or destructive does love have to beryllium to qualify as addictive love? On the broad view, we face a similar challenge. Although informationstechnologie ended up being that case that, on this view, everyone world health organization loves was technically addicted, only some subset of cases should beryllium judged to beryllium appropriate candidates for treatment because of their effect(s) on other aspects of ur well-being. Though the two views take radically different stances on the neurobiological underpinnings of problematic love, elektronische datenverarbeitung ended up being still the case that for both views elektronische datenverarbeitung was the negative consequences or harm of the ‘heilquelle love’ that determine whether the personlichkeit or people involved should be considered appropriate subjects for the application of some remedy.